I have a doc that is about 200k and DWMX is slow so whenever I edit anything, it's like being on a old P100 computer
> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Pope [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 October 2003 13:27 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] DWMX2004 > > > Is MX 2004 still as slow as DWMX is .. when saving files > etc.? I always got a huge lag ! Annoyed the hell out of me ! > (Good ol' Homesite+ happy on my l33t 500mhz machine > hehe)<bitterness> or am I gonna need a render-farm to save > stuff these days ? </bitterness> :�) > > Stephen > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 October 2003 13:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] DWMX2004 > > Hmmm.... > > Admittedly I have not used it in anger but I have been using > it, and other than a nice interface upgrade and a few feature > which were in studio but not in DW finally being included > (such as ctrl-w to close > all) I'm still not convinced. > > Kola > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [mailto:Neil.Robertson- > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: 09 October 2003 13:01 > >> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > >> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] DWMX2004 > >> > >> Many reasons....and not sound like an MM salesman ;-)... > >> > >> better Stylesheet support, > >> more of a code editor than previous versions > >> more stable (although it has been noted to be slower > etc.., I havent > >> found that to be the case) > >> generally all round polished off from MX 1.0 > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: 09 October 2003 12:56 > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] DWMX2004 > >> > >> > >> Interesting can I ask why? > >> > >> Kola > >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- > >> >> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [mailto:Neil.Robertson- > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> Sent: 09 October 2003 12:50 > >> >> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > >> >> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] DWMX2004 > >> >> > >> >> I would say so, yes.... > >> >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- > >> >> From: Snake Hollywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> Sent: 09 October 2003 12:51 > >> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> Subject: [ cf-dev ] DWMX2004 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Is there any reason to upgrade to this from DWMX6.1 ? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> ** Archive: > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >> >> > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> ** Archive: > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >> >> > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ** Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > >> human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> -- > >> ** Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > >> human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
