http://bugs.opencompositing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399
--- Comment #12 from Danny Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-28 15:47:15 --- (In reply to comment #9) > > Given all these facts, it was decided to drop it and make a clean start. > > This was not to leave users behind, but just to have blur code that works > > now > > and is maintainable in the future. That's also why Dennis stated that the > > old legacy blur won't be imported into Compiz' blur plugin. > > But you only left users behind, from user's point. > > I understand that you want code to be maintainable, but you can't just like > that remove expected functionality, if it was working. What's your suggestion to do instead? Don't say "just keep it" if you're not volunteering to maintain it. > > The person that wrote the code is free to remove it. > So maybe Xorg will completely remove Composite, 'cause it's so useless? Who says that composite is useless? Who said that the legacy blur functionality is useless? Unmaintainable != useless... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.opencompositing.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
