http://bugs.opencompositing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399
--- Comment #13 from Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-28 17:13:59 --- > What's your suggestion to do instead? Don't say "just keep it" if you're not > volunteering to maintain it. I have no idea, but removing this was MICROSOFT-LIKE move. They force hardware upgrades. I can't buy a new graphics card because you removed such great feature, because I save my money for LCD display (to replace 15'' CRT), not for super-hyper-ultra graphics card. I've buyed myself best I could. > > > The person that wrote the code is free to remove it. > > So maybe Xorg will completely remove Composite, 'cause it's so useless? > > Who says that composite is useless? Who said that the legacy blur > functionality > is useless? Unmaintainable != useless... Little bit of irony. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.opencompositing.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.compiz-fusion.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
