Yes On Jan 12, 2017, at 4:23 PM, Srinivas Naga Kotaru (skotaru) < [email protected]> wrote:
How to represent TB storage in PV? Is it Ti , similar to Gi? -- *Srinivas Kotaru* *From: *<[email protected]> on behalf of Srinivas Naga Kotaru <[email protected]> *Date: *Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 11:33 AM *To: *dev <[email protected]> *Subject: *storage labels Hi We are going to leverage storage labels feature with OCP 3.3. in storage label scenario, it seems PVC ignores PV capacity ( spec.capacity.storage) attribute and match depending on label selector in PV. Questions 1. If yes, then why do we need to specifiy storage attributes in PV and PVC? 2. If we have multiple sizes in single storage class, do we need to classify multiple lable selectors to match PVC claims? Like nfs-ssd-100gb for to match 100gb volumes, nfs-ssd-50gb for 50gb volumes? Am having different sizes of volumes in NFS, wondering single label enough or do I need to 1 label for same size volumes? -- *Srinivas Kotaru* _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev
