Am 07.03.2018 um 23:47 schrieb Mohamed A. Shahat:
> Hi All,
> My first question here, so i am hoping at least for some
> acknowledgement !
> * OCP v3.7
Do you use the enterprise version or the opensource one?
> * Several Worker Nodes
> * Few Workload types
> * One Workload, let's call it WorkloadA is planned to have dedicated
> Worker Nodes.
> * for WorkloadA , I'd like to send/route the Container Logs to an
> External EFK / ELK stack other than the one that does get setup
> with OCP
> * For Workload A, an ES cluster does already exist, we would like to
> reuse it.
> * There is an impression that the ES cluster that comes with OCP
> might not necessarily scale if the team operating OCP does not
> size it well
> 1. Has this done before ? Yes / No ? Any comments ?
As you may know is "handle logs in a proper way" not a easy task.
There are some serious questions like the following.
* How long should the logs be preserved
* How much logs are written
* How fast are the logs written
* What's the limit of the network
* What's the limit of the remote es
* and many many more questions
> 1. Is there anyway with the fluentd pods or else to route specific
> Workload / Pods Container logs to an external ES cluster ?
> 2. If not, i'm willing to deploy my own fluentd pods , what do i lose
> by excluding the WorkloadA Worker Nodes to not have the OCP
> fluentd pods ? for example i don't want to lose any Operations /
> OCP related / Worker Nodes related logs going to the embedded ES
> cluster, all i need is to have the Container Logs of WorkloadA to
> another ES cluster.
Have you looked at the following doc part?
As in the doc described you can send the collected fluentd logs to a
external es cluster.
You can find the source of the openshift logging solution in this repo.
> Looking forward to hearing from you,
dev mailing list