> this would be a problem, to me, if the donations don't > come from the community, who ideally would pay to develop features > useful for everyone, but from a company, who ultimately pays to develop > features that are commercially useful to them.
This highly reminds me of [0]. [0] http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2014/12/03/conservancy-supporter.html > i think this list is a self-organized commitee and should stay that way, > no need for bureaucratic management. +1; self-organized committee of both developers and users. (While scheduled IRC meetings might be useful.) > * accepting funding and donations would require to form a non-profit > organization? > > * if so where would it be located? we're all over the world > > * will be accept which currency/ies? or only cryptocoins?[0] > > * will be have a bank account? Or get a fiscal sponsor, leaving the same questions. > * or, will parabola hackers accept personal donations? if so, how will > be keep track of how much everyone is receiving and if the return in > development is fair? There is at least one person who says they would donate only if there was a Parabola Project that shared the money between developers in a fair way. > my fault, i'll fix it when you pay me!! >:) > > ↑ my third issue with donations... +1
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
