On 06/15/2016 03:15 AM, André Silva wrote: > On 06/15/2016 02:57 AM, coadde wrote: >> Now, see my new proposal below with the new changes about invariant >> sections, what do you think? > > +1, however i think we could add another detail in the exception part in > clause 2 to mean "cover texts" as another exception, eg: > > 2. **Parabola is Free Culture**: All documentation and cultural works > included in products of the Parabola project are [Free > Culture](http://freedomdefined.org/Definition), > with the exceptions of: [licenses for works stating a > viewpoint](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicenses), > [invariant > sections](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto-opt#SEC1) and > [cover texts](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto-opt#SEC2). > All documentation and cultural works created by or for Parabola are > Free Culture, with no exceptions.
I forgot add my suggestion about adhocracy with some changes for clause 4 :P
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
4. **Parabola and its community**: Parabola's community is [democratic
in its essence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_democracy)
and [adhocratic](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adhocracy) as form of
organization,
so the community is to be included whenever there is a need to make
a decision.
We encourage community participation in the development of the
project.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Adding "adhocracy" as form of organization clarify how works the
development of the project to encourage community participation. ;)
What do you think guys?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
