On 06/16/2016 04:15 PM, André Silva wrote: > On 06/16/2016 12:20 PM, fauno wrote: >> André Silva <[email protected]> writes: >>>> I am coming to the conclusion that we should create both articles >>>> (consensus democracy) and (adhocracy) from our own wiki [0]. We could >>>> use those references as inspiration (eg. Wikipedia articles) to begin >>>> our version. What do you think? >>>> >>>> [0] https://wiki.parabola.nu >>> >>> I've created articles about Consensus democracy [0] and Adhocracy [1] in >>> our wiki to be used in clause 4. Those articles are based on Wikipedia >>> articles ones. Maybe it need more expansion and modifications, but it is >>> a good way to avoid use linking to Wikipedia. What do you think guys? >>> >>> [0] https://wiki.parabola.nu/Consensus_democracy >>> [1] https://wiki.parabola.nu/Adhocracy >> >> i prefer this definition, i think it's more clear and has a nice step by >> step howto :P >> >> http://consensusdecisionmaking.org/ > > +1 such as reference for Consensus democracy, however we need for > Adhocracy meaning too. Do you have some reference for Adhocracy? It > could be good! :) > > Anyway, we could use our wiki article for Adhocracy temporally until get > one similar than consensusdecisionmaking.org for Adhocracy.
Fauno sent me some cool references [0][1][2] about Adhocracy made by him. Now, i'm translating it to english to add in our Adhocracy article [3] (i will remove current article based on Wikipedia in our wiki since it is very managerial since our point of view), then let you know when it's ready. :) [0] https://github.com/fauno/herramientas-para-la-adhocracia [1] http://wiki.hackcoop.com.ar/Adhocracia [2] http://wiki.hackcoop.com.ar/Galponeo [3] https://wiki.parabola.nu/Adhocracy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
