On 06/16/2016 12:20 PM, fauno wrote: > André Silva <[email protected]> writes: >>> I am coming to the conclusion that we should create both articles >>> (consensus democracy) and (adhocracy) from our own wiki [0]. We could >>> use those references as inspiration (eg. Wikipedia articles) to begin >>> our version. What do you think? >>> >>> [0] https://wiki.parabola.nu >> >> I've created articles about Consensus democracy [0] and Adhocracy [1] in >> our wiki to be used in clause 4. Those articles are based on Wikipedia >> articles ones. Maybe it need more expansion and modifications, but it is >> a good way to avoid use linking to Wikipedia. What do you think guys? >> >> [0] https://wiki.parabola.nu/Consensus_democracy >> [1] https://wiki.parabola.nu/Adhocracy > > i prefer this definition, i think it's more clear and has a nice step by > step howto :P > > http://consensusdecisionmaking.org/
+1 such as reference for Consensus democracy, however we need for Adhocracy meaning too. Do you have some reference for Adhocracy? It could be good! :) Anyway, we could use our wiki article for Adhocracy temporally until get one similar than consensusdecisionmaking.org for Adhocracy.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
