On 07/01/2016 02:48 AM, fauno wrote: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]> writes: >> basically what i'm saying, is, do consider putting chromium into >> the parabola repository (if it isn't being considered already?) and >> i know that the debian team has already done the patches needed to >> remove the advertising and privacy-violating features that are >> considered to be acceptable by google, so *that* won't be a huge >> effort either. > > back when chromium was blacklisted in parabola and other libre distro it > was about uncertainty on the licensing of at least one source file, > maybe that has been solved by now? i can't recall the details, but it > should be documented on our mail archive or gnu-linux-libre's
We should consider if Debian from its patches removes recommendation/support to non-Free add-ons from chromium. Firefox is a perfect case that recommends/supports non-Free add-ons and Debian doesn't uses FSF directory to solve it.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
