On 07/02/2016 05:01 PM, André Silva wrote: > On 07/02/2016 03:07 PM, André Silva wrote: >> On 07/02/2016 02:25 PM, fauno wrote: >>> Eliot Reyna <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> Exist a simple solution to "put back" to Chromium: include Iridium into >>>> the Parabola repo (is recommended by the FSF into the FSD instead of >>>> Chromium, and the development is focused to respect the privacy >>>> excluding all presence of Google intrusive tools and/or another >>>> licensing issues). >>>> >>>> Remember that Chromium and Iridium are based on modified BSD license, >>>> and maybe an "exorcism" could be needed to make effective into the FSDG. >>> >>> this is the gnu-linux-libre thread i was refering to: >>> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2011-03/msg00023.html >>> >>> if iridium removed these issues too, +1 for inclusion in repos >> >> +1, however i could repackage a libre version of iridium to link add-ons >> repository at FSF directory -> https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Iridium > > Even, we should remove Google, Yahoo and Bing search engines as we did > in Parabola with our browsers such as IceCat and Iceweasel.
Now i'm checking iridium source and i paid attention that it contains nonfree stuff such as Adobe Flash, see https://git.iridiumbrowser.de/cgit.cgi/iridium-browser/tree/third_party/adobe/README.chromium
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
