Exist a simple solution to "put back" to Chromium: include Iridium into
the Parabola repo (is recommended by the FSF into the FSD instead of
Chromium, and the development is focused to respect the privacy
excluding all presence of Google intrusive tools and/or another
licensing issues).
Remember that Chromium and Iridium are based on modified BSD license,
and maybe an "exorcism" could be needed to make effective into the FSDG.
El 01/07/2016 a las 07:50 a.m., André Silva escribió:
On 07/01/2016 02:48 AM, fauno wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]> writes:
basically what i'm saying, is, do consider putting chromium into
the parabola repository (if it isn't being considered already?) and
i know that the debian team has already done the patches needed to
remove the advertising and privacy-violating features that are
considered to be acceptable by google, so *that* won't be a huge
effort either.
back when chromium was blacklisted in parabola and other libre distro it
was about uncertainty on the licensing of at least one source file,
maybe that has been solved by now? i can't recall the details, but it
should be documented on our mail archive or gnu-linux-libre's
We should consider if Debian from its patches removes
recommendation/support to non-Free add-ons from chromium. Firefox is a
perfect case that recommends/supports non-Free add-ons and Debian
doesn't uses FSF directory to solve it.
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
