On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:17:40PM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > So far, I'm against "releasing" packages from the quarantine if they are > kept there until "some time", because this "release" would probably > favor "problematic" software rather than favor "innocent" software. >
The issue then becomes that software is accused, and even if it is completely innocent it will never get out of quarantine despite being completely clean. There has to be a method by which if no proper evidence is found that truly makes the software non-free it should be able to come back into the repos. > However, I'm in favor of making the reference fields for the quarantine > mandatory, and furthermore: I suggest to have evaluators investigate the > references to see if these are indeed valid and updated before adding a > package to the quarantine in the first place. > Alright, something we can work on :) -- Nicolás Ortega Froysa (Deathsbreed) https://themusicinnoise.net/ http://uk7ewohr7xpjuaca.onion/ Public PGP Key: https://themusicinnoise.net/[email protected]_pub.asc http://uk7ewohr7xpjuaca.onion/[email protected]_pub.asc
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
