On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:34:00AM -0700, jc_gargma wrote: > > So far (aside from some spelling and grammatical mistakes I had) someone > > also commented that apart from links to sources as to why something > > should be removed (or rather, stay removed since this is a quarantine) > > one should be able to post information about the code directly that is > > in question. I kind of thought this was a given, but this should be okay > > as well. > > > > However, aside from this one comment, I am unsure if people generally > > agree or if people simply have not been going over it. I would like > > community input since I think this would help to make freedom issues > > more efficient. > > I'm unable to view the pad as it produces multiple javascript errors. > > > In response to your main query: > I would consider explicit code snippets or statements akin to "lines X > through > Y on file Z of commit W" to avoid posting non-free code, as a given to > justify > whether software is non-free. > > > -jc
Yes, that is what someone mentioned on the pad as well (although you put it much more clearly, so I'll add it if you haven't already). -- Nicolás Ortega Froysa (Deathsbreed) https://themusicinnoise.net/ http://uk7ewohr7xpjuaca.onion/ Public PGP Key: https://themusicinnoise.net/[email protected]_pub.asc http://uk7ewohr7xpjuaca.onion/[email protected]_pub.asc
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
