> So far (aside from some spelling and grammatical mistakes I had) someone > also commented that apart from links to sources as to why something > should be removed (or rather, stay removed since this is a quarantine) > one should be able to post information about the code directly that is > in question. I kind of thought this was a given, but this should be okay > as well. > > However, aside from this one comment, I am unsure if people generally > agree or if people simply have not been going over it. I would like > community input since I think this would help to make freedom issues > more efficient.
I'm unable to view the pad as it produces multiple javascript errors. In response to your main query: I would consider explicit code snippets or statements akin to "lines X through Y on file Z of commit W" to avoid posting non-free code, as a given to justify whether software is non-free. -jc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
