+1 El 06/07/17 a las 16:20, Winter Taylor Jones escribió: > We could make two versions of the ISO, one that is manual install, like > Arch, and one that has a graphical installer, such as Manjaro. > > > On 07/06/2017 12:03 PM, Josh Branning wrote: >> See, I'm in two minds. On the one hand there is user experience, and >> on the other hand there is architectural elegance. >> >> I cannot think of a solution. If the graphical installer is included, >> you lose some architectural elegance, if it's left out, you lose some >> user experience. >> >> As it is, I agree that parabola currently firmly lives in the >> architectural elegance camp, at least for the CLI version. >> >> I think most people would agree that the current MATE desktop is not >> architecturally elegant as it stands, nor the best for user >> experience, so whatever the decision with that, there is likely to be >> an improvement with the graphical iso regardless. >> >> I did think that you could possibly exclude the graphical installer >> and have it as a package instead, instructing users to download it, >> but that would break the new no-internet-connection aspect(s) of the >> installer. >> >> You could produce or remaster two graphical ISOs, one with the >> installer, one without, but I think that may be too much work and >> perhaps be too picky and be too much of an ask. >> >> It is already known that some people would want to dd to a usb and >> have an installer present. If I am correct in saying a dd'ed iso image >> from a usb runs entirely in RAM then few will be dding the image as a >> +RW portable OS, meaning they shouldn't care if an installer is present. >> >> All in all, I think in this case there is no real wrong answer, >> especially no wrong answer worth fighting over. >> >> TBH, I'd probably use the LXDE iso with the installer myself out of >> laziness and speed of installation. >> >> With that said and out of the way of, from a user perspective, I would >> like the command line version of parabola to have a command line >> installer too, both for LXDE desktop and cli installations. >> >> On 06/07/17 19:09, bill-auger wrote: >>> >>> >>> much the same as megver just said - i tried to make the argument that >>> GUI support is desirable in the other thread >>> https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/2017-July/005685.html >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
