It would be a real shame for projects such as the following to not even
be considered due to a lack of clarity as to what extent Parabola is
implementing it's free cultural work policy.
https://github.com/rwengine/openrw
https://github.com/SFTtech/openage
https://github.com/OpenRCT2/OpenLoco
https://github.com/OpenRCT2/OpenRCT2
On 28/09/18 03:23, Josh Branning wrote:
Re. the questions; I was going under the assumption that if it's not
OK it shouldn't be included in parabola.
On 28/09/18 03:18, pribib wrote:
Perhaps the following?
1) OK or NOT OK to include non-free assets. (e.g. Warsow)
... and ...
2) OK or NOT OK to provide programs whose primary purpose are to obtain
non-free assets. (e.g. OpenRA)
3) OK or NOT OK to provide programs whose primary purpose are to make
use of non-free assets. (Whether this be importing into a game engine or
something else, e.g. OpenMW)
While a program like wget may be able to "import assets" it should not
be compared to programs whose primary reason for existence is to import
non-free assets.
On 28/09/18 03:12, Josh Branning wrote:
I strongly urge other developers to make their opinions known as to
where the line should be drawn.
Probably a consensus needs to be reached about
Whether it's ...
1) OK or NOT OK to include non-free assets.
... and ...
2) OK or NOT OK to link to non-free assets.
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
