Theoretically speaking and following my responses to said questions, the
list of supported sites for youtube-dl probably shouldn't exist in said
package.
Josh
On 28/09/18 04:10, pribib wrote:
One should probably also consider youtube-dl. Looking at the extensive
list of sites http://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/supportedsites.html I
would not think it unreasonable to presume that there are sites on this
list who only provide access to video files that are not free culture,
and so should be patched out or removed.
On 28/09/18 03:44, Josh Branning wrote:
On 28/09/18 03:41, Josh Branning wrote:
oops, #3 should have been OK, so long as it doesn't link or include
them.
so should have #2 so long as it doesn't link or include them.
... I will try again
My own questions:
1) NOT OK
2) NOT OK
Your questions
1) NOT OK
2) OK so long as it doesn't link or include non-free assets
3) OK so long as it doesn't link or include non-free assets
... basicimally. :/
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
