On Mon, Aug 3, 2015, at 12:37 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > stack makes it pretty easy to upgrade dependencies now. I'm thinking > it would be nice to do that once a month. The upsides are the usual > ones: bug fixes and security fixes that should be non-breaking. The > downsides are: potential breakage anyway, one big slow build once a > month, and detritus left around in ~/.stack and .stack-work. > > I think the upsides outweigh the downsides. There will also, > eventually, be better tools for cleaning up the stack working > directories. For now, if you're nearly out of space like I am, I think > we can just manually delete the old directories, e.g. > .stack-work/install/«arch»/lts-2.13 and > ~/.stack/snapshots/«arch»/lts-2.13. Worst case scenario those > directories are just regenerated with another big build. :) > > So, does anyone have any concerns if I start upgrading dependencies by > pushing changes to stack.yaml? > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/dev > Email had 1 attachment: > + signature.asc > 1k (application/pgp-signature)
I'm all for it. The downsides seem pretty minor compared to slowly drifting more and more out of date. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/dev
