On 08/03/2015 12:37 PM, Bryan Richter wrote:
> stack makes it pretty easy to upgrade dependencies now. I'm thinking
> it would be nice to do that once a month. The upsides are the usual
> ones: bug fixes and security fixes that should be non-breaking. The
> downsides are: potential breakage anyway, one big slow build once a
> month, and detritus left around in ~/.stack and .stack-work.
> 
> I think the upsides outweigh the downsides. There will also,
> eventually, be better tools for cleaning up the stack working
> directories. For now, if you're nearly out of space like I am, I think
> we can just manually delete the old directories, e.g.
> .stack-work/install/«arch»/lts-2.13 and
> ~/.stack/snapshots/«arch»/lts-2.13. Worst case scenario those
> directories are just regenerated with another big build. :)
> 
> So, does anyone have any concerns if I start upgrading dependencies by
> pushing changes to stack.yaml?
> 

I say: go for it! (In fact, I wouldn't mind *sometime* moving to GHC
7.10 now that we can work it with Stack, although I don't think it's
priority, if it happened without real work distracting from anything
else, I'd be happy about it.)

-- 
Aaron Wolf Snowdrift.coop <https://snowdrift.coop>
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to