dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [RFC] Be lenient about downstream encryption Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [RFC] Be lenient about downstream encryption Paul Stewart
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [RFC] Be lenient about downstream encryption Paul Stewart
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [RFC] Be lenient about downstream encryption Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [RFC] Be lenient about downstream encryption Paul Stewart
• [strongSwan-dev] multiple OU's Banio
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 0/5] IKEv1 fragmentation support for Windows peers Volker Rümelin
  • [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 1/5] Fix typo and whitespace Volker Rümelin
  • [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 2/5] ikev1: Fix code when to send fragments Volker Rümelin
  • [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 3/5] packet_t: Add methods to get/set IKEv1 fragment size Volker Rümelin
  • [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 4/5] ikev1: Add keyword onlycerts for parameter fragmentation Volker Rümelin
  • [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 5/5] ikev1: Fragmentation support for windows clients Volker Rümelin
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] updown: Assign the first virtual IP to PLUTO_MY_SOURCEIP Volker Rümelin
• [strongSwan-dev] IV for openssl cyphers Alexander Sbitnev
• [strongSwan-dev] TS_UNACCEPTABLE on Child SA setup after IKE reauth with virtual IP from DHCP Thomas Klute
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] TS_UNACCEPTABLE on Child SA setup after IKE reauth with virtual IP from DHCP Tobias Brunner
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] TS_UNACCEPTABLE on Child SA setup after IKE reauth with virtual IP from DHCP Thomas Klute
• [strongSwan-dev] cookies check in DPD packets SM K
• [strongSwan-dev] Strongswan Android Client not receiving packets on 3G Stefan Anca
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Strongswan Android Client not receiving packets on 3G Stefan Anca
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Strongswan Android Client not receiving packets on 3G Tobias Brunner
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Strongswan Android Client not receiving packets on 3G Stefan Anca
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Strongswan Android Client not receiving packets on 3G Tobias Brunner
• [strongSwan-dev] Contributing libcharon plugin Lev Stipakov
• [strongSwan-dev] Q: is ikev1 dpd sensitive to ipsec traffic as proof of liveness? Charlet, Ricky
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Q: is ikev1 dpd sensitive to ipsec traffic as proof of liveness? Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Q: is ikev1 dpd sensitive to ipsec traffic as proof of liveness? Charlet, Ricky
• [strongSwan-dev] Building strongswan5 deb Lev Stipakov
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Building strongswan5 deb Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Building strongswan5 deb C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Building strongswan5 deb Lev Stipakov
• [strongSwan-dev] Charon vendor ID patches C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Charon vendor ID patches Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Charon vendor ID patches C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH net-next 0/2] Pack struct xfrm_usersa_info and struct xfrm_userpolicy_info Fan Du
  • [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH net-next 2/2] include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h: Pack struct xfrm_usersa_info Fan Du
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH net-next 2/2] include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h: Pack struct xfrm_usersa_info Fan Du
  • [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH net-next 1/2] include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h: Pack struct xfrm_userpolicy_info Fan Du
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH net-next 1/2] include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h: Pack struct xfrm_userpolicy_info Fan Du
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH net-next 0/2] Pack struct xfrm_usersa_info and struct xfrm_userpolicy_info Fan Du
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH net-next 0/2] Pack struct xfrm_usersa_info and struct xfrm_userpolicy_info Fan Du
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH net-next 0/2] Pack struct xfrm_usersa_info and struct xfrm_userpolicy_info Fan Du
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH net-next 0/2] Pack struct xfrm_usersa_info and struct xfrm_userpolicy_info Fan Du
• [strongSwan-dev] DHCP plugin ignores "server" parameter Thomas Klute
• [strongSwan-dev] openssl plugin FIPS modes? Zachery Stoddard
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] openssl plugin FIPS modes? Zachery Stoddard
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] openssl plugin FIPS modes? Andreas Steffen
• [strongSwan-dev] Question about Nat and IPcomp Robin
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Question about Nat and IPcomp Thomas Klute
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Question about Nat and IPcomp Robin
• [strongSwan-dev] Help Lukasz Grzelak
• [strongSwan-dev] Responder generates TS_UNACCEPTABLE, if initiator is behind NAT (transport mode + IKEv2) Ansis Atteka
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] proposal: Add possibility to register custom proposal keyword parser Thomas Egerer
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] proposal: Add possibility to register custom proposal keyword parser Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] Routing through local interface (E.g. tun0) Harry Stark
• [strongSwan-dev] Dynamic Multipoint VPN (opennhrp) with strongswan Timo Teras
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Dynamic Multipoint VPN (opennhrp) with strongswan Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Dynamic Multipoint VPN (opennhrp) with strongswan Timo Teras
  • [strongSwan-dev] GRE KEY in traffic selectors Timo Teras
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Dynamic Multipoint VPN (opennhrp) with strongswan Timo Teras
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Dynamic Multipoint VPN (opennhrp) with strongswan Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Dynamic Multipoint VPN (opennhrp) with strongswan Timo Teras
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Dynamic Multipoint VPN (opennhrp) with strongswan Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] dhcp: Allow binding of socket to particular interface Thomas Egerer
  • [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] man: Add documentation of the dhcp interface option Thomas Egerer
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] dhcp: Allow binding of socket to particular interface Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] dhcp: Allow binding of socket to particular interface Thomas Egerer
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] dhcp: Allow binding of socket to particular interface Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] How to best conduct a cipher key update? Marksteiner, Stefan
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] How to best conduct a cipher key update? Thomas Egerer
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] How to best conduct a cipher key update? Marksteiner, Stefan
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] xauth_pam don't open/close PAM sessions Andrea Bonomi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] xauth_pam don't open/close PAM sessions Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] xauth_pam don't open/close PAM sessions Andrea Bonomi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] xauth_pam don't open/close PAM sessions Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] updown: fix segfault when interface name can't be resolved Ansis Atteka
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] updown: fix segfault when interface name can't be resolved Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] charon immediately killed when attaching with gdb Ansis Atteka
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] charon immediately killed when attaching with gdb Ansis Atteka
• [strongSwan-dev] ANNOUNCE: strongswan-5.1.1rc1 released Andreas Steffen
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] debian: build debug symbol package Ansis Atteka
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] debian: build debug symbol package Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] pki in /usr/bin conflicts with pki pki-core package Avesh Agarwal
• [strongSwan-dev] [IKE] loaded 0 RADIUS server configurations Ccf Cloud
• [strongSwan-dev] Strongswan: 4.5.3: Notify Cookies for Half Open Tunnels jegathesh malaiyappan
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Strongswan: 4.5.3: Notify Cookies for Half Open Tunnels Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] kernel-netlink: Allow to override xfrm_acq_expires value Ansis Atteka
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] kernel-netlink: Allow to override xfrm_acq_expires value Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] Using client cert to identify user when authby=xauthrsasig p p
• [strongSwan-dev] SNMP feature Ali Masoudi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] SNMP feature Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] Attestation IMV crash during initialization Avesh Agarwal
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] Attestation IMV crash during initialization Andreas Steffen
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] Attestation IMV crash during initialization Avesh Agarwal
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] kernel-netlink: increase buffer size for RT netlink messages Ansis Atteka
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] kernel-netlink: increase buffer size for RT netlink messages Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] Regarding missbehaviour of strongswan4.5.3 while configure ikev1 Ranjan Kumar Mishra
• [strongSwan-dev] gdb and IPsec does not seem to work Sebastian Wurst
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] gdb and IPsec does not seem to work Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] gdb and IPsec does not seem to work Sebastian Wurst
• [strongSwan-dev] Doubt on IPSec client TSr negotiation siddesh r
• [strongSwan-dev] Regarding missbehaviour of strongswan4.5.3 while mix configuration of ikev1 and sec-gw ikev2 Amit Kumar
• Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] Force libtls when libpttls is enabled Thomas De Schampheleire
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] Force libtls when libpttls is enabled Andreas Steffen
• [strongSwan-dev] IPSEC counters sima hooshyar
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] IPSEC counters sima hooshyar
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] kernel-pfroute: Fix mixed up memset() call in get_route() Mathias Krause
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] kernel-pfroute: Fix mixed up memset() call in get_route() Tobias Brunner
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] For PFS prefer DH group from IKE_SA over first configured Thomas Egerer
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] For PFS prefer DH group from IKE_SA over first configured Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] Traffic Loss observed strongswan with CISCO SGW as a peer jegathesh malaiyappan
• [strongSwan-dev] Linker error about missing -lrt when compiling malloc_speed.c Avesh Agarwal
• [strongSwan-dev] Problems on test suite when running it with options --with-user and --with-group Anaelle POGNOT
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Problems on test suite when running it with options --with-user and --with-group Andreas Steffen
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] pkcs11: keyid alias Raphael Geissert
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] pkcs11: keyid alias Raphael Geissert
• [strongSwan-dev] Rekey Question Daniel Palomares
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Rekey Question Daniel Migault
• [strongSwan-dev] Strongswan: ESP encryption priority is different in IKEv1 and IKEv2 jegathesh malaiyappan
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Strongswan: ESP encryption priority is different in IKEv1 and IKEv2 Andreas Steffen
• [strongSwan-dev] Strongswan is sending MALFORMED packet when received the INIT message from Juniper GW jegathesh malaiyappan
• [strongSwan-dev] ANNOUNCE: strongswan-5.1.0rc1 released Andreas Steffen
• [strongSwan-dev] Regarding to enhance strongswan code to support multiple namespaces with single strongswan instance narayana rao katakamsetti
• [strongSwan-dev] Basic doubt on ikev1 rekey siddesh r
• [strongSwan-dev] IKEv2: Allow peer to choose between transport xor tunnel mode in presence of NAT Sebastian Wurst
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] IKEv2: Allow peer to choose between transport xor tunnel mode in presence of NAT Sebastian Wurst
• [strongSwan-dev] build StrongSwan 5.0.4 Ben Zhu
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] build StrongSwan 5.0.4 Ben Zhu
• [strongSwan-dev] StrongSwan 5.0.4 and IAS/ECC smartcards Hugo Damme
• [strongSwan-dev] RFC 5685: Redirect Mechanism for the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 Daniel Barbu
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] RFC 5685: Redirect Mechanism for the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 Daniel Barbu
• [strongSwan-dev] IV is not send by kernel. Grzegorz Głowacki
• Re: [strongSwan-dev] I try to generate the Makefile failed. Could someone help me? Martin Willi
• Re: [strongSwan-dev] Strongswan can't work for some msgs in my case, such as SCTP INIT msg. Martin Willi
• Re: [strongSwan-dev] FW: rationale of reqid update on responder side jegathesh malaiyappan
• [strongSwan-dev] ClusterIP and Virtualization Daniel Palomares
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] ClusterIP and Virtualization Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] ClusterIP and Virtualization Daniel Palomares
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] ClusterIP and Virtualization Daniel Palomares
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] ClusterIP and Virtualization Daniel Palomares
• [strongSwan-dev] rationale of reqid update on responder side Christophe Gouault
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] rationale of reqid update on responder side Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] rationale of reqid update on responder side Christophe Gouault
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] rationale of reqid update on responder side Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] rationale of reqid update on responder side Christophe Gouault
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] rationale of reqid update on responder side Christophe Gouault
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] rationale of reqid update on responder side Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] rationale of reqid update on responder side Christophe Gouault
• [strongSwan-dev] df-bit and dscp features yordanos beyene
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] df-bit and dscp features Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] Issue in strongswan v4.4.1 Amit Kumar
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Issue in strongswan v4.4.1 Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] Issues trying DMVPN Zachery Stoddard
• [strongSwan-dev] strongswan package for archlinux Dmitry Korzhevin
• [strongSwan-dev] Multiple IKE_SAs for a single tunnel James Hulka
• [strongSwan-dev] scripted tunnel creation Zachery Stoddard
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] scripted tunnel creation Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] scripted tunnel creation Zachery Stoddard
• [strongSwan-dev] ANNOUNCE: strongSwan-5.0.4 released / ECDSA signature vulnerability (CVE-2013-2944) Tobias Brunner
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] Reduce noise in log file Volker Rümelin
  • [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] Reduce noise in log file Volker Rümelin
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH] Reduce noise in log file Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] Add unique ID in up/down Emanuil Hristov
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Add unique ID in up/down Martin Willi
• Re: [strongSwan-dev] Dev Digest, Vol 39, Issue 9 : The host system crashes if pinging the IPs behind the tunnel. LIU Jingen
• [strongSwan-dev] Issue: After setting up the IPsec tunnel, ping the VPN server causes the host crash. LIU Jingen
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Issue: After setting up the IPsec tunnel, ping the VPN server causes the host crash. Martin Willi
• [strongSwan-dev] Multiple client connection using MSCHAP v2 and strongswan app Ashwani Kumar
• [strongSwan-dev] [strongswan]: Multiple IKE SA and IPSEC SA for single connection after DPD jegathesh malaiyappan
• [strongSwan-dev] How to read source code of strongswan? nanjian5
• [strongSwan-dev] [strongswan ]: Multiple IKE SA initiated for with Same Connection Name version 4.5.3 jegathesh malaiyappan
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [strongswan ]: Multiple IKE SA initiated for with Same Connection Name version 4.5.3 jegathesh malaiyappan
• [strongSwan-dev] [strongSwan]:IKEv1: "ipsec down" jegathesh malaiyappan
• [strongSwan-dev] Problem with Android VPN Client on Motorola DROID RAZR running Android 4.1.2 Peck, Michael A
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Problem with Android VPN Client on Motorola DROID RAZR running Android 4.1.2 Tobias Brunner
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Problem with Android VPN Client on Motorola DROID RAZR running Android 4.1.2 Peck, Michael A
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Problem with Android VPN Client on Motorola DROID RAZR running Android 4.1.2 Tobias Brunner
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Problem with Android VPN Client on Motorola DROID RAZR running Android 4.1.2 Peck, Michael A
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] Problem with Android VPN Client on Motorola DROID RAZR running Android 4.1.2 Tobias Brunner
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 3/3] libcharon: Add error unification support to bus Thomas Egerer
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 2/3] libcharon: Add error unification interface Thomas Egerer
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 1/3] libcharon: Extend logger_t:log with an id Thomas Egerer
• [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Proposer error unifier for loggers Thomas Egerer
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Proposer error unifier for loggers Thomas Egerer
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Proposer error unifier for loggers Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Proposer error unifier for loggers Thomas Egerer
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Proposer error unifier for loggers Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Proposer error unifier for loggers Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Proposer error unifier for loggers Thomas Egerer
• [strongSwan-dev] ANNOUNCE: strongswan-5.0.3rc1 released Andreas Steffen
• [strongSwan-dev] [strongSwan]:IKEv1: "ipsec down" jegathesh malaiyappan
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [strongSwan]:IKEv1: "ipsec down" jegathesh malaiyappan
• Re: [strongSwan-dev] [strongswan]: [IKEV2]: IKE SA Establising with By pass policy configured in other end jegathesh malaiyappan
• [strongSwan-dev] [Strongswan]: Node is replying for ISAKMP message for unconfigured connection jegathesh malaiyappan
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [Strongswan]: Node is replying for ISAKMP message for unconfigured connection jegathesh malaiyappan
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] [Strongswan]: Node is replying for ISAKMP message for unconfigured connection jegathesh malaiyappan
• [strongSwan-dev] 2 transport mode CHILD SAs, tunnel up, connection down James Hulka
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] 2 transport mode CHILD SAs, tunnel up, connection down Martin Willi
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] 2 transport mode CHILD SAs, tunnel up, connection down James Hulka
  • Re: [strongSwan-dev] 2 transport mode CHILD SAs, tunnel up, connection down Martin Willi

• Earlier messages
• Later messages