I found that major difference comes from https://review.tizen.org/gerrit/#/c/6033/ .
While this does not look any bad with the commit alone, it lacks the architectural review. To support the multi user, the relationship of AMD and launchpad should be addressed first. I posted a thread, Tizen 3.0 proposal for fixing OSP/WRT/Core hard-coded UID issue, and Mr. Sunil moved the mail to new mailing list.
I am very comfortable with existing commits except above one. Maybe my suggestion is not complete but any architectural decision should be addressed before changing existing multiuser-related changes. The current merge commit almost overwrites above change.
Young
------- Original Message -------
Sender : Ylinen, Mikko<[email protected]>
Date : 2013-10-08 19:36 (GMT+09:00)
Title : Re: Re: Re: [Dev] code dumps without proper review
Mikko,
On the merge commit, the following two files should be resurrected:
packaging/aul.changes
packaging/aul.manifest
I understand that the location for SMACK manifest file is moved under packaging directory. However, there exists duplicated files of ac.service/ac_user.service and [email protected]/launchpad-preload_user.service. I am not quite sure which of them are used in reality. Would you give me any clue, especially for IVI profile, please?
|
|
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
