Anyway, it's a big step for Tizen packages quality if we can remove the prepackages at all. BTW, mic's yum will not be used ever in the future, so it's safe even prepackages existing.
thanks - jf.ding On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:41:41AM +0100, Jacek Bukarewicz wrote: > Yes, that was the reason I did it this way. I noticed that Intel > image does not contain prepackages section and packages are still > installed in the correct order so I followed this approach. > Prepackages in RD-PQ image were defined incorrectly which caused the > filesystem package install failure as I described here: > > https://lists.tizen.org/pipermail/dev/2013-November/000742.html > > I was also told that prepackages are not currently supported by > mic's yum backend [1] . I don't know if we care about yum backend at > all, but that's another thing that make prepackages potentially more > problematic. > > [1] /usr/lib/mic/plugins/backend/yumpkgmgr.py:186-188 > def preInstall(self, pkg): > # FIXME: handle pre-install package > return None > > > On 11/07/2013 04:59 AM, Jian-feng Ding wrote: > >Oh, that's really a good news. The reason of so many prepackages in ks is the > >plenty of packaging errors in original tizen packages. If all the errors are > >fixed, the prepackages can be cleaned up in theory. > > > >thanks > >- jf.ding > > > >On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 03:54:46AM +0000, Dong, Junfeng wrote: > >>Prepackages are not needed for 3.0. and the basic system packages can be > >>installed in the right order according to their runtime dependence. On > >>x86 side, this is also verified: without prepackage, the image is good to > >>be created and boot. > >>Junfeng > >> > >>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > >>Behalf Of Jinkun Jang > >>Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 11:01 AM > >>To: Liu, Bing Wei; Jacek Bukarewicz; [email protected]; 주현구; 나세홍; 이동현 > >>Subject: Re: [Dev] [important] My change in profile/mobile/meta-mobile > >>needs to be merged > >> > >> > >>Hi > >> > >>This is Jinkun Jang > >> > >>Because I do not understand your patch, I did not review. > >> > >>"Without this change generated RD-PQ images are completely unusable." > >> > >>Why do you remove all PrePackages for RD-PQ. > >> > >>I agree that they many packages can be removable and have to be. > >> > >>But some packages can be installed before installing other package. > >> > >>Could you explain your patch more detail? > >> > >> > >> > >>Thanks > >> > >>Jinkun Jang > >> > >> > >> > > > > > -- > Jacek Bukarewicz > Samsung R&D Institute Poland > Samsung Electronics > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
