> -----Original Message----- > From: José Bollo [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 4:18 PM > To: Zhang, Xu U > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Dev] The SAPI proposal > > On mar, 2014-06-17 at 10:13 +0200, José Bollo wrote: > > On mar, 2014-06-17 at 02:04 +0000, Zhang, Xu U wrote: > > (snip) > > > > > [Zhang Xu ] Yes, extension is not trusted. The third party can implement > their extensions. > > > > How are third party extensions installed? Is it a tizen feature? > > I found: > https://crosswalk-project.org/#documentation/tizen_ivi_extensions > > But is it a tizen feature? [Zhang Xu ] extension mechanism is not only for Tizen but also for other platforms. > > Best regards > José > > > > > > In crosswalk original API permission design, which has been dropped > > > because Cynara security framework proposed, extension must send an > > > IPC to browser process to do permission check before extension talk to > service. > > > > Is it possible for an extension to call the service even if the > > permission was refused by the browser process? From what I'm reading > > the answer should be true. But from what I understand of the security, > > the answer should be no. So? > > > > Best regards > > José > > > > > (resnip) > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
