Hi, Do you expect I and my teammates can get the access we've requested anytime soon?
It was <2014-09-22 pon 13:43>, when JF Ding wrote: > Patrick, > > Currently, the scm/meta/git update will not be synced to Gerrit > settings automatically, but need to run a script in backend manually, > for more safety checkings. So there will be some mismatching time > windows. > > thanks > - jf.ding > > > On Monday, September 22, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > >> On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 10:24 +0200, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: >> > It was <2014-09-18 czw 18:18>, when Patrick Ohly wrote: >> > > On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 11:01 +0200, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > A few days ago some changes to scm/meta/git has been merged[1]. It >> > > > appear they still need soome processing to take effect. Please anyone >> > > > capable apply those changes to take real effect in gerrit. >> > > > >> > > > [1] https://review.tizen.org/gerrit/#/c/27354/ >> > > >> > > Another example where updating scm/meta/git does not seem to have had an >> > > effect is the cleanup of "Social & Content" in >> > > https://review.tizen.org/gerrit/#/c/27048/ >> > > and a more recent review request for contacts-service in >> > > https://review.tizen.org/gerrit/#/c/27753/ >> > > >> > > According to my understanding, the latter should have had Samsung's >> > > maintainers added as default reviewers because they are listed for >> > > "Social & Content / PIM", to which contacts-service belongs. >> > > >> > > Is my understanding correct? >> > >> > I am afraid I don't know. Those people are from a different team and >> > acutally I do not know them. >> > >> >> >> My question was about the behavior of Gerrit and thus to JF Ding and/or >> Sasha. I replied to you because I seem to have the same problem as you - >> meta/git was edited+merged and that doesn't seem to have the desired >> effect. >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Patrick Ohly >> >> The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although >> I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way >> represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak >> on behalf of Intel on this matter. >> >> > > -- Łukasz Stelmach Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
pgpQ_Y7AApoWu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
