On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 20:22 +0800, JF Ding wrote: > There’s no doubt that GBS support will be supported actively. GBS > building is just the local side solution of OBS,
It's not quite that simple. gbs has certain expectations about the git tree (source unpacked in branch, for example) which OBS doesn't have. So supporting gbs in addition to OBS is causing at least some extra work. I'm with Carsten here, I would have dropped gbs support for packages coming from Yocto to keep the overall system simpler. OBS could still be supported by exporting .spec + source archive directly into it for these packages. But when we discussed this, the conclusion was that this would be too much of a change for Tizen and thus gbs support is still part of the plans. See Dominig's email about the new workflow for details. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
