On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 11:45 +0800, JF Ding wrote: > On Thursday, November 27, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 20:22 +0800, JF Ding wrote: > > > There’s no doubt that GBS support will be supported actively. GBS > > > building is just the local side solution of OBS, > > > > > > It's not quite that simple. gbs has certain expectations about the > > git > > tree (source unpacked in branch, for example) which OBS doesn't > > have. So > > supporting gbs in addition to OBS is causing at least some extra > > work. > Actually, in OBS side, the source exporting work is also done by > gbs-export module,
But only in the Tizen layers above traditional OBS, right? In other words, when someone submits a certain revision of a git tree containing unpacked source plus packaging meta data. We don't have to do it like that. When someone modifies .bb meta data, we need to run a converter. The current output of that converter is a .src.rpm. We can import that directly into OBS. In fact, that's how I am currently testing that converter tool. The extra work for gbs would be to also import the .src.rpm into the git tree. It's not rocket science, just cumbersome and potentially confusing when both humans and machines end up submitting to the same git tree or even the same branch. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
