On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If it is a private class it might not be sensible to have that class name
> in the logfiles. If it is public the class could and should probably be
> refactored. ;-)
>
> I'm only a little afraid of the dollar sign. It is often a bash variable
> and thus bound to be typo prone when used for greps, configurations, ..
>
> Could a logger name attribute be an option?
>

What do you mean?

Gary

>
> 2017-08-12 20:44 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why does that matter?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Aug 12, 2017 12:34, "Dominik Psenner" <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Are the nested classes private or public?
> > >
> > > 2017-08-12 20:29 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I you use nested classes to build loggers, you end up with logger
> names
> > > > like A$N1, A$N2 and so on.
> > > >
> > > > If you then set a logger level in a config using "A", it does not
> > affect
> > > > A$N1 and A$N2 as you might expect, since "$" is not a ".".
> > > >
> > > > What about treating "$" like a "."?
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > Gary
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dominik Psenner
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dominik Psenner
>

Reply via email to