This is a vote to migrate from the existing git-wip-us infrastructure to the currently supported gitbox infrastructure that Infra advocates for using nowadays. Using gitbox will allow our projects to integrate better with GitHub including the ability to merge PRs directly from the site and the ability to push commits to GitHub and have them be automatically mirrored back to Apache. Not only that, but new Apache projects cannot use the old git-wip-us infrastructure anymore, so it makes sense to migrate to the best supported option going forward.
The migration process will entail the following: * Marking existing git repo as read-only * Moving repo to gitbox * Update website and pom.xml with new SCM URLs * Update local git clones with the new remote URL(s) Note that this vote only applies to the source code. I'm not considering using GitHub Issues instead of Jira, for example. Note also that this vote does not apply to the use of subversion for publishing the site (svnpubsub) nor the use of it for publishing releases (only available via svn), though moving the sites from svnpubsub to gitpubsub (i.e., storing the generated site in a branch called "asf-site", similar to the "gh-pages" branch feature on GitHub) would be a related topic to cover separately. Please vote +1, +0, -0, or -1. -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
