+1 On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:48 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > Gary > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 17:12 Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This is a vote to migrate from the existing git-wip-us infrastructure to > > the currently supported gitbox infrastructure that Infra advocates for > > using nowadays. Using gitbox will allow our projects to integrate better > > with GitHub including the ability to merge PRs directly from the site and > > the ability to push commits to GitHub and have them be automatically > > mirrored back to Apache. Not only that, but new Apache projects cannot > use > > the old git-wip-us infrastructure anymore, so it makes sense to migrate > to > > the best supported option going forward. > > > > The migration process will entail the following: > > > > * Marking existing git repo as read-only > > * Moving repo to gitbox > > * Update website and pom.xml with new SCM URLs > > * Update local git clones with the new remote URL(s) > > > > Note that this vote only applies to the source code. I'm not considering > > using GitHub Issues instead of Jira, for example. Note also that this > vote > > does not apply to the use of subversion for publishing the site > (svnpubsub) > > nor the use of it for publishing releases (only available via svn), > though > > moving the sites from svnpubsub to gitpubsub (i.e., storing the generated > > site in a branch called "asf-site", similar to the "gh-pages" branch > > feature on GitHub) would be a related topic to cover separately. > > > > Please vote +1, +0, -0, or -1. > > > > -- > > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > >
