+1 Also for the log4net repository.
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, 23:59 Remko Popma, <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:48 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Gary > > > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 17:12 Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > This is a vote to migrate from the existing git-wip-us infrastructure > to > > > the currently supported gitbox infrastructure that Infra advocates for > > > using nowadays. Using gitbox will allow our projects to integrate > better > > > with GitHub including the ability to merge PRs directly from the site > and > > > the ability to push commits to GitHub and have them be automatically > > > mirrored back to Apache. Not only that, but new Apache projects cannot > > use > > > the old git-wip-us infrastructure anymore, so it makes sense to migrate > > to > > > the best supported option going forward. > > > > > > The migration process will entail the following: > > > > > > * Marking existing git repo as read-only > > > * Moving repo to gitbox > > > * Update website and pom.xml with new SCM URLs > > > * Update local git clones with the new remote URL(s) > > > > > > Note that this vote only applies to the source code. I'm not > considering > > > using GitHub Issues instead of Jira, for example. Note also that this > > vote > > > does not apply to the use of subversion for publishing the site > > (svnpubsub) > > > nor the use of it for publishing releases (only available via svn), > > though > > > moving the sites from svnpubsub to gitpubsub (i.e., storing the > generated > > > site in a branch called "asf-site", similar to the "gh-pages" branch > > > feature on GitHub) would be a related topic to cover separately. > > > > > > Please vote +1, +0, -0, or -1. > > > > > > -- > > > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > > > >
