The only criteria I am aware of for voting for a release is that it has the proper notice and license files and is properly signed. AFAIK nothing says it has to actually build. That said, voting on such a release would be stupid.
Obviously, I would like others to use (and support) the project or I wouldn’t have bothered creating it here. At the same time I really wouldn’t like to have the software just languish. The bottom line is you should use whatever criteria makes YOU comfortable, not me. Ralph > On Jun 15, 2018, at 4:29 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ralph, > > I kind of feel bad just VOTing by running through the build motions and not > having an application to actually test. That would just mean that I can > build the software and look at reports. > > Do you feel comfortable with this kind of VOTE? > > Gary > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 5:08 PM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > >> This vote has now been open 5 days and needs one more +1 vote from a PMC >> member. Again, votes from everyone are welcome. >> >> Ralph >> >>> On Jun 14, 2018, at 4:35 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Matt. Gary replied that he had started reviewing it 2 days OK. >> Mikael’s vote also would count on this but he has been very quiet for the >> last several months. I hope all is well. >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>>> On Jun 14, 2018, at 7:58 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'll be back home tomorrow where I have computers set up for testing >> Apache >>>> releases. >>>> >>>> On 12 June 2018 at 22:10, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> (Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves http://picocli.info >>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 13, 2018, at 9:03, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I started reading the site, which is good so far... should be able to >>>>>> continue tomorrow... >>>>>> >>>>>> Gary >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 17:35 Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 48 hours have passed with no votes or discussion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ralph >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 10, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Ralph Goers < >> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is a vote to release Log4j-Audit 1.0.0, the first release of >> the >>>>>>> Log4j Audit project. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers >>>>> list. >>>>>>>> [] +1, release the artifacts >>>>>>>> [] -1, don't release because... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or more if required). All >> votes >>>>>>> are welcome and we encourage everyone to test the release, but only >>>>> Logging >>>>>>> PMC votes are “officially” counted. As always, at least 3 +1 votes >> and >>>>> more >>>>>>> positive than negative votes are required. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tag: >>>>>>>> a) for a new copy do "git clone >>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j-audit.git"; and >>>>> then >>>>>>> "git checkout tags/log4-audit-1.0.0-rc1” >>>>>>>> b) for an existing working copy to “git pull” and then “git checkout >>>>>>> tags/log4j-audit-1.0.0-rc1” >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Web Site: http://rgoers.github.io/log4j-audit/index.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maven Artifacts: >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>> orgapachelogging-1035/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Distribution archives: >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4j-audit/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You may download all the Maven artifacts by executing: >>>>>>>> wget -e robots=off --cut-dirs=7 -nH -r -p -np --no-check-certificate >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>> orgapachelogging-1035/org/apache/logging/log4j/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ralph >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>
