Added my vote. Apologies for not getting to this sooner. I should've
brought an extra laptop with me on the trip.

On 17 June 2018 at 10:31, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I’m back home now and will review this today.
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 08:59, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
>> Today this vote will have been open 1 week. I would ask that you please
>> find the time to review it and vote.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> > On Jun 15, 2018, at 5:34 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Good points.
>> >
>> > I see use cases for audit logging in at least two of my products at
>> work,
>> > so I have no doubts as to the usefulness of this project.
>> >
>> > Gary
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 6:10 PM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> The only criteria I am aware of for voting for a release is that it has
>> >> the proper notice and license files and is properly signed. AFAIK
>> nothing
>> >> says it has to actually build. That said, voting on such a release
>> would be
>> >> stupid.
>> >>
>> >> Obviously, I would like others to use (and support) the project or I
>> >> wouldn’t have bothered creating it here. At the same time I really
>> wouldn’t
>> >> like to have the software just languish.
>> >>
>> >> The bottom line is you should use whatever criteria makes YOU
>> comfortable,
>> >> not me.
>> >>
>> >> Ralph
>> >>
>> >>> On Jun 15, 2018, at 4:29 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Ralph,
>> >>>
>> >>> I kind of feel bad just VOTing by running through the build motions
>> and
>> >> not
>> >>> having an application to actually test. That would just mean that I
>> can
>> >>> build the software and look at reports.
>> >>>
>> >>> Do you feel comfortable with this kind of VOTE?
>> >>>
>> >>> Gary
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 5:08 PM Ralph Goers <
>> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> This vote has now been open 5 days and needs one more +1 vote from a
>> PMC
>> >>>> member. Again, votes from everyone are welcome.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ralph
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On Jun 14, 2018, at 4:35 PM, Ralph Goers <
>> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks Matt. Gary replied that he had started reviewing it 2 days
>> OK.
>> >>>> Mikael’s vote also would count on this but he has been very quiet for
>> >> the
>> >>>> last several months. I hope all is well.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Ralph
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Jun 14, 2018, at 7:58 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I'll be back home tomorrow where I have computers set up for
>> testing
>> >>>> Apache
>> >>>>>> releases.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 12 June 2018 at 22:10, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> +1
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> (Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves
>> >> http://picocli.info
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 13, 2018, at 9:03, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I started reading the site, which is good so far... should be
>> able
>> >> to
>> >>>>>>>> continue tomorrow...
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Gary
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 17:35 Ralph Goers <
>> >> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> 48 hours have passed with no votes or discussion.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Ralph
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 10, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Ralph Goers <
>> >>>> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> This is a vote to release Log4j-Audit 1.0.0, the first release
>> of
>> >>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>> Log4j Audit project.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j
>> developers
>> >>>>>>> list.
>> >>>>>>>>>> [] +1, release the artifacts
>> >>>>>>>>>> [] -1, don't release because...
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or more if required).
>> All
>> >>>> votes
>> >>>>>>>>> are welcome and we encourage everyone to test the release, but
>> only
>> >>>>>>> Logging
>> >>>>>>>>> PMC votes are “officially” counted. As always, at least 3 +1
>> votes
>> >>>> and
>> >>>>>>> more
>> >>>>>>>>> positive than negative votes are required.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Tag:
>> >>>>>>>>>> a)  for a new copy do "git clone
>> >>>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j-audit.git
>> "
>> >> and
>> >>>>>>> then
>> >>>>>>>>> "git checkout tags/log4-audit-1.0.0-rc1”
>> >>>>>>>>>> b) for an existing working copy to “git pull” and then “git
>> >> checkout
>> >>>>>>>>> tags/log4j-audit-1.0.0-rc1”
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Web Site:  http://rgoers.github.io/log4j-audit/index.html
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Maven Artifacts:
>> >>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> >>>>>>> orgapachelogging-1035/
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Distribution archives:
>> >>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4j-audit/
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> You may download all the Maven artifacts by executing:
>> >>>>>>>>>> wget -e robots=off --cut-dirs=7 -nH -r -p -np
>> >> --no-check-certificate
>> >>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> >>>>>>> orgapachelogging-1035/org/apache/logging/log4j/
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Ralph
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>> --
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>



-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to