I’m OK with that, assuming I can remember which one it was.

Ralph

> On Jun 17, 2018, at 3:53 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> About the logo: I would prefer that everywhere we use it we stick to the 
> Log4j 2 logo as it was designed and not change the colors or pattern any 
> more. 
> 
> The original looks much more clean and professional.  
> 
>> On Jun 18, 2018, at 2:06, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Matt!
>> 
>> Any help you want to provide would of course be welcome! If you have ideas 
>> on how to improve the documentation please go for it!
>> 
>> As for the Log4j logo, I didn’t see any reason not to use it and didn’t 
>> really want to spend the time creating a new one.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>>> On Jun 17, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> Notes:
>>> 
>>> * The git checkout command only worked for me without the "tags/" prefix to
>>> the tag name, not sure why.
>>> * If you change the wget command to use --cut-dirs=5, you can use the same
>>> command with the dist.a.o URL, pretty handy for verifying the artifacts
>>> * I recently discovered you can use gpg --verify-files to verify multiple
>>> files in a single command, so a helper for that would be "find . -name
>>> '*.asc' | gpg --verify-files". This might be worth noting on our download
>>> pages.
>>> * After our recent conversation about other uses for audit logging, I'm
>>> interesting in writing a blog post on how to use this with something like
>>> Zipkin.
>>> 
>>> Site notes:
>>> * Home page title is wrong. It has an errant "Log4j_Audit" in it.
>>> * Do we want to reuse the Log4j 2 logo here?
>>> * Something looks off in the getting started page for code formatting.
>>> * A similar issue I have with the main Log4j site: it would be nice if
>>> references to class names were linked to their javadoc pages. This might be
>>> easier to do with asciidoc since it has better macros than velocity.
>>> * Your examples make me envy your production logs. They must be rather well
>>> organized!
>>> * It'd be nice to migrate the docs to asciidoc in the future. I can handle
>>> that conversion if you want (though it'd be after the release work I have
>>> queued).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>> 
>> 
> 


Reply via email to