The homepage feature listing is all inline now instead of a proper list.

On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 12:01, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Built using:
>
> Apache Maven 3.6.1 (d66c9c0b3152b2e69ee9bac180bb8fcc8e6af555;
> 2019-04-04T14:00:29-05:00)
> Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.1/libexec
> Java version: 1.8.0_163, vendor: Azul Systems, Inc., runtime:
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/zulu-8.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.14.5", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac"
>
> JDK used for building java9 modules:
>
> openjdk version "11.0.1" 2018-10-16 LTS
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment Zulu11.2+3 (build 11.0.1+13-LTS)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Zulu11.2+3 (build 11.0.1+13-LTS, mixed mode)
>
> Signatures of repository.a.o and dist.a.o artifacts look good.
>
> `mvn -Prat apache-rat:check` looks good.
>
> Notes about the release that should be fixed later:
> * doap_log4j2.rdf is several versions behind. This file needs to be
> regenerated via whatever mvn command made it. This should likely be
> added to the release process when the changelog is generated.
> * .mvn/wrapper/maven-wrapper.jar is a binary file. Not sure if we
> should be including that in the source tar/zip.
> * NOTICE is copyright up to 2017; this is only a few months away from
> being three years out of date at this point.
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 10:57, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, that was an unrelated test in one of my own projects that was 
> > failing. It was because of a small change in ListAppender which is only 
> > used for tests. The behavior is otherwise correct.
> >
> > I still need to try the release itself (build from source, verify 
> > signatures, etc) before voting.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 10:00, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> If it is just a test failing due to a change to the ListAppender I don’t 
> >> think I’d want to create another RC due to a test failing due to an error 
> >> or behavioral change introduced in a test class.
> >>
> >> Ralph
> >>
> >> > On Aug 7, 2019, at 7:46 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 10:37 AM Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I believe I've figured out the regression. It was a behavioral change
> >> >> documented in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2527 and
> >> >> thus isn't a regression.
> >> >>
> >> >> I'll continue reviewing.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Are you then saying that the failing test is expected? If yes, then 
> >> > surely
> >> > then the test should be updated and another RC prepared, right?
> >> >
> >> > Gary
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 09:26, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> There seems to be a regression somewhere that was introduced in a
> >> >>> previous release between 2.11.1 and this version. Or it could be that
> >> >>> the code I'm testing out relied on a bug. I haven't figured out the
> >> >>> issue yet, though it's strange so far.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 08:31, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Based on the tag git checkout tags/log4j-2.12.1-rc1
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Apache RAT check OK
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I could not find a way to run the CLIRR check on the log4j-api module.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Running 'mvn clean install' OK using:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Apache Maven 3.6.1 (d66c9c0b3152b2e69ee9bac180bb8fcc8e6af555;
> >> >>>> 2019-04-04T15:00:29-04:00)
> >> >>>> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.6.1\bin\..
> >> >>>> Java version: 1.8.0_221, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
> >> >> C:\Program
> >> >>>> Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_221\jre
> >> >>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> >> >>>> OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family:
> >> >> "windows"
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Can anyone reproduce this:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> [ERROR] Failures:
> >> >>>> [ERROR]   AbstractActionTest.testExceptionsAreLoggedToStatusLogger:48
> >> >>>> [INFO]
> >> >>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 2060, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 26
> >> >>>> [INFO]
> >> >>>> [INFO]
> >> >>>>
> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>>> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Log4j 2 2.12.1:
> >> >>>> [INFO]
> >> >>>> [INFO] Apache Log4j 2 ..................................... SUCCESS [
> >> >>>> 2.535 s]
> >> >>>> [INFO] Apache Log4j API Java 9 support .................... SUCCESS [
> >> >>>> 5.745 s]
> >> >>>> [INFO] Apache Log4j API ................................... SUCCESS
> >> >> [01:12
> >> >>>> min]
> >> >>>> [INFO] Apache Log4j Implementation Java 9 support ......... SUCCESS [
> >> >>>> 2.341 s]
> >> >>>> [INFO] Apache Log4j Core .................................. FAILURE
> >> >> [15:59
> >> >>>> min]
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> ?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Gary
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:43 AM Ralph Goers <[email protected]
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.12.1, the next version of the
> >> >> Log4j 2
> >> >>>>> project.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers
> >> >> list.
> >> >>>>> [] +1, release the artifacts
> >> >>>>> [] -1, don't release because...
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> The vote will remain open for 72 hours (or more if required). All
> >> >> votes
> >> >>>>> are welcome and we encourage everyone to test the release, but only
> >> >> Logging
> >> >>>>> PMC votes are “officially” counted. As always, at least 3 +1 votes
> >> >> and more
> >> >>>>> positive than negative votes are required.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Changes in this release include:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Fixed Bugs
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>        • LOG4J2-1946: Allow file renames to work when files are
> >> >> missing
> >> >>>>> from the sequence. Thanks to Igor Perelyotov.
> >> >>>>>        • LOG4J2-2650: Support emulating a MAC address when using
> >> >> ipv6.
> >> >>>>> Thanks to Mattia Bertorello.
> >> >>>>>        • LOG4J2-2366: Remove references to LoggerContext when it is
> >> >>>>> shutdown.
> >> >>>>>        • LOG4J2-2644: Improve the performance of capturing location
> >> >>>>> information.
> >> >>>>>        • LOG4J2-2658: AbstractAction.reportException records a
> >> >> warning to
> >> >>>>> the status logger, providing more information when file based
> >> >> appenders
> >> >>>>> fail to compress rolled data asynchronously.
> >> >>>>>        • LOG4J2-2659: AbstractAction handles and records unchecked
> >> >>>>> RuntimeException and Error in addition to IOException.
> >> >>>>>        • LOG4J2-2667: Values not bound to statement" when using JDBC
> >> >>>>> appender, appender does not respect bufferSize=“0”. Thanks to Edith
> >> >> Chui.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Changes
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>        • LOG4J2-2556: Make Log4j Core optional for Log4j 1.2 API.
> >> >>>>>        • LOG4J2-2646: Update MongoDB 3 driver from 3.10.1 to 3.10.2.
> >> >>>>>        • LOG4J2-2657: Improve exception messages in the JDBC
> >> >> appender.
> >> >>>>>        • LOG4J2-2660: Retry when JDBC throws a
> >> >>>>> java.sql.SQLTransactionRollbackException in commitAndClose().
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Tag:
> >> >>>>> a)  for a new copy do "git clone
> >> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2.git"; and then "git checkout
> >> >>>>> tags/log4j-2.12.1-rc1”
> >> >>>>> b) for an existing working copy to “git pull” and then “git checkout
> >> >>>>> tags/log4j-2.12.1-rc1”
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Web Site:  http://rgoers.github.io/log4j2-site/index.html.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Maven Artifacts:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1048
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Distribution archives:
> >> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4j/
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> You may download all the Maven artifacts by executing:
> >> >>>>> wget -e robots=off --cut-dirs=7 -nH -r -p -np --no-check-certificate
> >> >>>>>
> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1048/org/apache/logging/log4j/
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Ralph
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>



-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to