Cute :-) But... Over at Apache Commons, we just dropped all trunk branches a long time ago. No renames, it's simpler IMO.
Gary On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 9:57 AM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > I am planning on creating a branch off the 1.2.17 tag. That branch will be > named main. > I will make that the default branch. Then I plan to rename trunk to a nice > name like > DEAD-HEAD (GRATEFUL) > > Ralph > > > On Dec 23, 2021, at 7:20 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > A name like "version" should only be for tags. Once a version is > released, > > it does not make sense to have a branch by that name, but it would be OK > to > > have a name for a "maintenance line", as we did with "2.12.x", so here we > > would have "1.2.x" which is lame IMO because we're ONLY EVER going to > have > > 1.2 releases, so it might as well stay in master/main/trunk. > > > > Gary > > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 9:17 AM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> WAIT, what? That does not make sense, it's the same bad name we ended up > >> in with the "2.12" branch instead of "2.12.x". > >> > >> Gary > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 8:50 AM Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> I was already asked to create a branch off of 1.2.17. It will become > the > >>> main branch so trunk can be left alone. > >>> > >>> Ralph > >>> > >>>> On Dec 23, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> If we use this repo, is everyone OK renaming "trunk" to "master" in > >>> order > >>>> to match the branch name of our other repos? > >>>> > >>>> Gary > >>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 1:34 AM Ralph Goers < > >>> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I have cloned the read-only log4j repo to > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j1. > >>>>> > >>>>> I have followed the build instructions and had to modify the javadoc > >>>>> plugin to not fail on errors. Now it fails in the site plugin. > >>>>> > >>>>> If someone else wants to take this on I would suggest the first PR > >>> should > >>>>> just to the pom.xml file to get the build working as is. > >>>>> > >>>>> Ralph > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >
