I see only one mention of Antora, the tool you are proposing. You don't have to sell us Asciidoc; we all have our opinions about it; the majority of the document is about "why not" but little "why Antora"
I would be more interested in the challenges/benefits of Antora, and how such a system could be added to our landscape. Also, can we use one Antora for all subprojects, including Flume, does it need to be different Antoras... these kind of things. On Wed, Dec 20, 2023, at 16:42, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > As a part of the planned Log4j website & manual revamp > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/ntq6db0w4vhqb9bydmn5h683xsgkdkbc>, my > proposal is to stick to what we already have (i.e., AsciiDoc) and just > automate the publication > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pNPSW0J39Huz3oxiETdR-TcO9mucI-66GsiaCy4IyiQ>. > I > ask for your feedback on this proposal. > > Please take into account that this discussion is only about the *tooling*. > The structure-related discussion can be found here > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/qomkx2v6gpyk09wjcjs0hp7cxfohz6z7>.
