On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 5:05 PM Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@apache.org> wrote:
> I see only one mention of Antora, the tool you are proposing. I am indeed **not** proposing Antora (removed its mentions), but plain AsciiDoc, which is exactly what we have in Log4j, Log4j Kotlin, Log4j Scala, Log4j Tools, Log4j Transform, Log4j JMX GUI, Log4j Jakarta, and Logging Parent today. We re-evaluated the options with Piotr today, the multi repository setup, multiple Log4j manuals, Log4j configuration wizard in the making, etc. and I decided to settle down to what we already have and rather improve the experience. > You don't have to sell us Asciidoc; we all have our opinions about it; the > majority of the document is about "why not" but little "why Antora" > I would be more interested in the challenges/benefits of Antora, and how > such a system could be added to our landscape. > Given everything is already in AsciiDoc and now I clarified that I indeed only propose using plain AsciiDoc, I presume I addressed your concerns above. Please let me know if there is anything else I should be addressing in my document.
