On Wed, Dec 20, 2023, at 17:50, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 5:05 PM Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> I see only one mention of Antora, the tool you are proposing. > > > I am indeed **not** proposing Antora (removed its mentions), but plain > AsciiDoc, which is exactly what we have in Log4j, Log4j Kotlin, Log4j > Scala, Log4j Tools, Log4j Transform, Log4j JMX GUI, Log4j Jakarta, and > Logging Parent today.
How should I know? In almost every talk we had about this in the past times, you were routing for Antora. > We re-evaluated the options with Piotr today, the multi repository setup, > multiple Log4j manuals, Log4j configuration wizard in the making, etc. and > I decided to settle down to what we already have and rather improve the > experience. We = you & Piotr? I was surprised to find out you were having a meeting for a milestone that also included me. No more Antora? Why, all of a sudden? You have told me many stories about Antora's benefits in the past months. Now, are these benefits no longer true? > Given everything is already in AsciiDoc and now I clarified that I indeed > only propose using plain AsciiDoc, I presume I addressed your concerns > above. Please let me know if there is anything else I should be addressing > in my document. No, I don't think you addressed my concerns. Please let me know why you re-considered, and Antora seems off the table. I don't need to keep Antora, I am not a huge fan, but your message concerns me.
