[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12910539#action_12910539 ]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2649: ----------------------------------------- bq. Should we make it optional, whether the valid bitset should be computed? Many apps wouldn't need it, so it just ties up (admittedly smallish amounts of) RAM unnecessarily? +1 we can save that overhead and high level apps can enable it by default if needed. > FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2649 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ryan McKinley > Fix For: 4.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch, > LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch > > > The FieldCache returns an array representing the values for each doc. > However there is no way to know if the doc actually has a value. > This should be changed to return an object representing the values *and* a > BitSet for all valid docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org