[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12910740#action_12910740 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2649: -------------------------------------- bq. I agree that we should avoid static fields to control behavior. But do we avoid it at the cost of not allowing the option, or waiting till we rework FieldCache? I agree with this sentiment - progress, not perfection. Being able to turn it on or off for everything in the process is better than nothing at all. > FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2649 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ryan McKinley > Fix For: 4.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch, > LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch, LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch > > > The FieldCache returns an array representing the values for each doc. > However there is no way to know if the doc actually has a value. > This should be changed to return an object representing the values *and* a > BitSet for all valid docs. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org