On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote:
>>  And it certainly isn't up to you alone to decide by placing it on the Wiki 
>> as a "trivial" update.
> 
> Most of the updates to that page were made w/o consensus, just as mine
> was.  

You know there is a difference.  In the past, updates were made to the steps 
involved and subsequent RM's went and followed them or improved them.  Your 
update was to say throw all that work out, if you so desire, and do what you 
want.  While, yes, I will agree it is not official, it is the de facto standard 
by which we have done releases and RM's have always worked to it.  So, yes, we 
can argue the semantics of a wiki page, but the intent of that page, IMO, is 
that the RM follow it and that has, AFAICT, always been how RMs have acted when 
doing releases.

-Grant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to