On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > >> I get your reasoning, but unfortunately, because you don't understand how >> Maven works you don't realize why maintaining it downstream is not an >> option. Sorry. >> > > Seems very doable to me. A couple dudes get together and become the > authority for Lucene/Solr Maven themselves. Apply to Mavens whatever > process, make a website, throw a party, make maven artifacts. In a short > time you will be known as the source of Maven artifacts for Lucene/Solr, > sending out our signed jars to the masses. We don't need to do it. No > one has said anything about the Maven process that locks us into doing it. >
Like I said, you don't get how it works. It's obvious by the comment. > Comparing Maven support to code features is insane IMO. We are in the > business of code in my opinion. Code and tagging code as a release - at > most putting the release on the mirrors. So, if the large majority of people get Lucene through Maven would you feel the same way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
