On Oct 19, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Michael McCandless > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hmm but how does this explain how the number of mergeprops has grown >> so much recently? I think recent merges have generally been toplevel? >> > > i introduced a lot of them by combining trunk's analyzers into > modules/analysis, > because things were reorganized, there are many, but still there are > more than necessary and this could be cleaned up.
Couldn't 3.x move contrib/analysis to modules? We could just move it to contrib as part of the release packaging if the goal is to be consistent, but otherwise who cares where it is located? Would that reduce some of this? > > still, if we are going to refactor lucene+lucene contrib+solr in other > ways (i hope we will!) I would imagine we would see more of this in > the future. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -------------------------- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com/ Search the Lucene ecosystem docs using Solr/Lucene: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
