[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14139095#comment-14139095
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5944:
-------------------------------------

I didnt delete any branch or control anyone's commits. I just did an svn copy.

As far as continuing the 4.x line, who will be responsible for the backwards 
compatibility of those indexes? The current situation is not sustainable. 
I don't see a lot of people jumping up and down to help out with 3.x index back 
compat issues.


> move trunk to 6.x, create branch_5x
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5944
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5944
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>             Fix For: 5.0
>
>
> In order to actually add real features (as opposed to just spending 24/7 
> fixing bugs and back compat), I need a trunk that doesn't have the back 
> compat handcuffs.
> In the meantime, we should rename the current trunk (which is totally tied 
> down in back compat already, without even a single release!) to branch_5x 
> while you guys (i wont be doing any back compat anymore) figure out what you 
> want to do with the back compat policly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to