[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14139195#comment-14139195
 ] 

Anshum Gupta commented on LUCENE-5944:
--------------------------------------

I understand the back-compat issue but honestly, people working on Solr side of 
things have stuff in trunk that they wanted to release as part of the next 
non-backcompat release (major release). I, and I'll assume others too, had more 
things planned for the 5.0 release.
With none of that happening with 5.0 and users getting a back-compat breaking 
release there, it'd be bad for the users to receive another release that's 
reasonably different, and breaks API's just a few months after 5.0 goes out.

I'm proposing that we work together to have releases (and release numbers) that 
sound reasonable to the users (and developers).

> move trunk to 6.x, create branch_5x
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5944
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5944
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>             Fix For: 5.0
>
>
> In order to actually add real features (as opposed to just spending 24/7 
> fixing bugs and back compat), I need a trunk that doesn't have the back 
> compat handcuffs.
> In the meantime, we should rename the current trunk (which is totally tied 
> down in back compat already, without even a single release!) to branch_5x 
> while you guys (i wont be doing any back compat anymore) figure out what you 
> want to do with the back compat policly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to