+1 to this idea. I recall talking to Robert and Mark about it as a good first step as part of the spatial code consolidation as well.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Simon Willnauer < simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote: > hey, > > today I came across function query in lucene and that reminded me that > Solr is already using its own derived version which is no good IMO. We > should try to consolidate the two version and make solr use the > consolidated version which would even be good for lucene users. It > seems it would make lots of sense to make the entire function query > stuff a module and drop it from core in 4.0. I didn't look too close > into the solr version but it seems to be not that hard to luceneify it > and move it to modules, thoughts? > > simon > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Chris Male | Software Developer | JTeam BV.| www.jteam.nl
