I plan to address SOLR-8180 which is about adding jcl-over-slf4j as a dependency on SolrJ.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:11 AM Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote: > I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this > branch. > > Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this > branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will > delay a release candidate build. > > Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets > asap. > > I expect to create the first RC this time next week. > > Thanks! > > Upayavira > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the > feature freeze starts. > > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. > > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes > issue with replication" > > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" > > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical > "Add tests for bin/post" > > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a > release > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)" > > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), > blocker > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" > > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not > consider this a blocker either. > > - o - > > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. > Anyone have comments/observations here? > > I will create the branch shortly. > > Upayavira > > > -- Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
