@Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one already On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> wrote: > Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots of > people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if > you get more traffic on this starting next week ;) > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks! >> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4. >>> >>> Upayavira >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote: >>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into >>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are >>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the >>>> > feature >>>> > freeze starts. >>>> > >>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. >>>> > I >>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the >>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. >>>> > >>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: >>>> > >>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker >>>> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes >>>> > issue with replication" >>>> > >>>> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release? >>>> > >>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical >>>> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" >>>> > >>>> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. >>>> > >>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical >>>> > "Add tests for bin/post" >>>> > >>>> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a >>>> > release >>>> > >>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical >>>> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)" >>>> > >>>> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? >>>> > >>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), >>>> > blocker >>>> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" >>>> > >>>> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not >>>> > consider this a blocker either. >>>> > >>>> > - o - >>>> > >>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. >>>> > Anyone >>>> > have comments/observations here? >>>> > >>>> > I will create the branch shortly. >>>> > >>>> > Upayavira >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
-- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
