[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13019370#comment-13019370
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2956:
------------------------------------------
Simon, nice work. I agree with Michael B. that the deletes are super complex.
We had discussed using sequence ids for all segments (not just the RT enabled
DWPT ones) however we never worked out a specification, eg, for things like
wrap around if a primitive short[] was used.
Shall we start again on LUCENE-2312? I think we still need/want to use
sequence ids there. The RT DWPTs shouldn't have so many documents that using a
long[] for the sequence ids is too RAM consuming?
> Support updateDocument() with DWPTs
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2956
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2956
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: Realtime Branch
> Reporter: Michael Busch
> Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Realtime Branch
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2956.patch, LUCENE-2956.patch
>
>
> With separate DocumentsWriterPerThreads (DWPT) it can currently happen that
> the delete part of an updateDocument() is flushed and committed separately
> from the corresponding new document.
> We need to make sure that updateDocument() is always an atomic operation from
> a IW.commit() and IW.getReader() perspective. See LUCENE-2324 for more
> details.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
